Given some time ago, the web-magazine Judith Bertrand site Still Images. Vincent Cespedes y described the concept of encouplement, which means the conjugality sustainable mandatory The contracting of love. (1)
We suffer from encouplement , this parody of love. This great gag hyperplebiscité to police the people, sweeten its invigorating games, do a robbery on her dizziness and resell it in dribs and drabs and great prices - good sexual sanitized and disconnected from human implications. Inhibition, anxiety, lying, guilt, deception: encouplés accept the sub-sub-living and loving as long as everyone follow them (sic) , and provided they are perceived as "normal" in the eyes of everybody. (2)short, it will be understood, the encouplement is not good. Vincent Cespedes claims the French tradition, that of Gaston Bachelard, the philosophers and poets, rather than the builders of systems, such as German philosophers he dislikes (except Nietzsche, of course!). For my part, I tend to applaud this philosophical position that chooses his gaze on objects "trivial" and interest in the world where c'qu'on lives in true ... Congratulations, then!
Vincent Cespedes claims a report love the language and work on his texts to the last comma. (1) Again, it was rather like applauding. bad anyway that this work patient and loving obviously does not extend to the Internet or Vicente Cespedes - modern tools - keep a blog. It reads a definition of encouplement in less than 20 lines. This is the text I quoted above, and continues:
What love can create an indestructible complicity, are what encouplés refuse to take into account in their give and paranoid ( sic) their dealings severe. They not believe in loyalty naturally generated by love. They demand it as a starting point, then it is the result of a common free trembled. But this loyalty then they care little. (resic) (2)For a lover of words and language, 3 hénaurmes shells in 20 lines, it makes one wonder ... It is said that he did not even proofread or - worse - it leaves a small hand the task of writing a blog ... Anecdotal? Probably. But I can not get rid of the idea that this lack of demand in The form also reflects the character a bit light a nice thought and generous, sometimes biting, but where one sentence anyway to detect traces of a specific philosophical approach.
philosophy is also forging concepts, Vincent Cespedes reminds us in the broadcast quoted above. And we do not create concepts for the luxury of playing with the French language, concepts are created to bring the nuances of the French language does not (1).There is one Okay. Finally: roughly agree. Deleuze we had already explained, the story concept. But is that the implicit reference to Deleuze is not a bit over-sized to sell us thought cespédienne? Question nuances in all cases, and Gilles Vincent did not play very much in the same division ...
philosophers have not sufficiently dealt with the nature of the concept as a philosophical reality. They preferred to regard it as knowledge or data representation, which was explained by impaired ability to form (abstraction, or generalization) or to use it (trial). But the concept is not given, was created to create. He is not trained, it posits itself in itself, self-positing. The two become involved, since what is actually created, the living work of art, has thus a self-position itself, or a character autopoietic what we recognize it. (3)The encouplement is probably a good slogan, it is perhaps a fair and relevant ... But is this really a concept? In short: the encouplement is not well, but were do we need the encouplement to be convinced?
(1) - D @ ns text: Cespedes: the encouplement and porn.
(2) - The encouplement, contractual or love - Vincent Cespedes
weblog (3) - Gilles Deleuze - What is philosophy?
