Silk Feeling Polyester

youth

Manuel tells us about his recent misadventure which unfortunately did nothing exceptional (via the Heretic).

We may quibble with envy as some commentators that the teenager who alpagué our big Bill had finally committed a very slight rudeness that deserves opprobrium.

is being misled about the meaning heavily to bring to this event.

I'm sure many of you as I had the unfortunate experience of a young con-strapped benchmarks. Let me tell you mine and that of my brother who will not fail to be representative of a certain mentality.

sooner had I joined the school benches in a fit of nostalgia, some of my classmates and myself had decided to pay a visit to our former teachers college.
It was a lovely afternoon we spent except that it ends so many incongruous for your servant.

While we exchanged endless front of the hotel, three or four adjacent olibrius hurried down the road at full speed with the intention obviously to attract attention: vehicle backfiring ostentatious colors, multiple trips back and forth, etc..

So I let my eyes lose some of these clowns as anyone would have done in the context of a conversation that focuses your attention. Except that a single glance, as it was furtive was a sufficient reason for one of invidivus come to me to quarrel.

Can not see it coming: I hardly paid attention to this back-and-fro. The car stopped
, a young adult came down, came up to me and his upper meter ninety had just enough time to say "it's me you looking at?" before shake my throat and struck me with a headbutt.

not so much pain that left me speechless stupefaction. And yet I knew this unwritten rule that prevails in areas "disadvantaged" never, never meet the eyes of these young idiots. But what do you, that day, I just released my guard.

Misadventure also for my brother whose stature has yet what to frighten many.
1.97 m to 140kg. This has not prevented a teenager aged just 12 to 13 years to the inquiry by asking him first if he had a handkerchief, which he then gave him a piece money, which he did not. It even took out a flashlight we-don't-know-where.
Not one of these traditional flashlights that you keep it carefully in his glove, but not those the size of a club, very popular with security guards . He knocked
so my brother in the forearm and left unmolested.

A punch and the young con have had their heads screwed out yet.

Mathieu has brilliantly identified what it is: young research benchmarks. Except as landmarks, nobody gives them. From then it tests the boundaries, pushing a little more by bidding until they are ... often too late.

All these stories have a common point: the cake of Manu, the look that I left lying around and the coin of my brother. Mere excuses to test his omnipotence.

Also, a teenager who calls an adult so rude in the familiarly with, I am sure this aggressive tone that we all know, the challenge is already .

The facts themselves are only slightly objectionable. Certainly. But should we expect that these challenges escalate in physical attacks, even as crimes or offenses to be offended and oppose?
I hope not.

Meanwhile, I can not tell you how pleased I am no longer living in this climate that in my anxiety no longer the preserve of the few suburbs.

PS: The question of ethnicity is foreign to this subject. For the record, the young jerk who assaulted me was white.
PPS: Photo found at Nicolas . I love it!

My Friend Mother Big Boobs

Stop hue justice!

I wanted to comment immediately ticket Falcon the death of John Paul Treiber he calls "judicial suicide " but the time I missed as you already know.

interest to respond to time-cons is that reaction gives way to reflection .

It is one thing I can not agree and the lawyer I am, despite having absolutely no judicial activity, promptly defended against the French justice a despicable trend very French: the mob .

But when I read the author's conclusion: This

justice still refuses to self-criticism and questioning. What has happened since Outreau , besides the fact that the senior judge in this case has any chance of receiving a promotion the next few days?
Not much. And that's a shame ...

I noted at the outset a serious contradiction in the discourse of the Falcon:

First, the disease of the French political and social life, of wanting to find officials from across .

However, it shares the assumption the media and even popular disaster judicial Outreau is put exclusively on the liabilities of French justice. Repeat with the objectivity
Outreau case is crucial because today it seems to be the leitmotif of scribblers who have lost their capacity for analysis and questioning on the benches of the school of journalism. However, when a system failure is blamed by the same press spectrum Outreau inevitably reappears as if they had been there, the secret weapon that would dispense a factual analysis, detailed and objective.

What is more hateful in what emerges from this case is the this compulsive need to hurry to find a scapegoat thrown as food to an audience immersed in the emotion and thirsty by the need to repress. If allowed, he would do little to show us how we humans can be real tight carrion our claws on it before us as the ideal culprit.

In this case, the scapegoat is the person designated all of the investigating judge Fabrice Burgaud. Young, rather inexperienced, careless attitude. The ideal cast the villain of the series or B series aired in the U.S. judicial afternoon of housewives under 50 on M6.

Except here, the facts and the actors are real. And except to ensure the reproduction of these events in the short to medium term, it can hardly be satisfied with the sacrificial rite at the meeting.

So when I read an article recently Monde.fr , I can not be seized with a nausea against this filthy journalism, in which a fear of God to his own self-criticism, diverts attention of sharks that we are distilling drops of blood leading to the bait Burgaud.

Outreau is to the balance sheet of a company of emotion and unreason , served by a press too prone to sensationalism and in which justice can only with difficulty to maintain a dam right, gradually yielding to the onslaught of dehumanization.

" I do not want any of my enemies (but who really deserves the name?) From falling into the hands of justice. inhuman machine, I said. I stand. Inhumaine especially in its relationship to time . " according to Alain Juppe.

This inhumanity is beyond doubt that the consequence of a requirement itself inhumane towards our Judicature. Everyone would like the judges take the time to treat the serenity to our fate if we fall into the hands of justice. However, in an outburst of schizophrenia, successive governments have not hesitated to drastically reduce the resources to conduct this important mission.

In France, there are professional judges 11.9 per 100 000 inhabitants, against nearly 15 in Belgium, 20 in Austria, Germany and almost 25.

Budget justice would put France 29th among European ( Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, October 2006).

In 1968 there were 600,000 criminal complaints for 6,000 judges , there in 2007 and 8,000 complaints 5.300.0000 magistrates almost the same number as the Second Empire. This represents a 900% increase in crime in 40 years while the number of judges increased by 30% over the same period!

French court would not have made his self-criticism? Although she did not have the time, it has been the only obliged to do so by a parliamentary commission of inquiry which everyone will have to attend the hearings televised strengthening a bit more solemnity of public sacrifice.
The public have learned from this fiasco? Experts? The media?

Justice can do well this year for questioning, no one is ready to take the necessary steps to correct the vagaries of the system. Judge Burgaud was a player of this disaster but it has been an actor.

He was not the prosecutor who ordered the investigation of the case, it was not the judge of freedoms and detentions that placed indicted in custody interim basis, it was not the experts who confirmed the credibility indisputable evidence of child accusers it was not the judge nor the jury who convicted six of the seventeen indicted in the Assize Court of Saint-Omer , it was not all magistrates whom he referred for an opinion, it was not the daily press which claimed the head of these traffickers pedophiles, it was not those policies that did the same.

But more importantly, it is not every day of those who booed one hand, and dispute undermines the authority of our court while holding his structural failure of the other. Protecting our

justice. Do not cede to the ease of emotion.