Pokemon Crystal N6300

PS: the quiet Frêche?

"We're not really there? Peaceful, the Frêche?"

is what must now say some barons PS finally freed for good hair to scrape Languedoc Georges Freche which one can say he did not hesitate to utter statements of the politically incorrect. While some

bienpensants do not hesitate to make shortcuts in Manichaean making the former Mayor of Montpellier a vile racist holed up in the socialist lines, most agree that despite the many inappropriate statements, Georges Freche has proven throughout of his career these tendencies were alien.

Eviction in 2007 by Georges Freche was not insufficient in that it does not kill in it the influence of the character in that the operation of the PS suits very well the local barons. And that's what the former socialist: a local baron.

Thus, the list officially supported by the Rue de Solferino is ironically headed by the current mayor of Montpellier, which should mandate that the defection of Georges Freche due to multiple directorships. In addition, most socialist federations of the Languedoc-Roussillon strongly supports the current President of the Region. Its influence is total. Some speak of over 15,000 activists Inserts fully committed to his cause.

15,000 activists who may well follow in its wake is not nothing, especially in a bad way PS.

Now it seems that many recognize the quality of the work of Georges Freche for the city of Montpellier and the region.

Why not to renew its confidence? Worse still, why a decision so late?

moved to a sentence, certainly calculated, probably clientelist filed against a political enemy of 30 years. The PS knows that he will certainly lose the region for the outgoing President is known ever-present. Georges Freche

deserves maybe it opposes, but q ome thing bothers me in this decision ...

A decision which grants the sensationalism of the media, aping atrociously sarkos populism, preferring to meet an image rather than the interests of voters.
In other words, the politics of sound bites, motivating the most important decisions.

I do not think it is smart. Although Frêche is an arrant provocative.

I would have preferred that the decision be cons-balanced, under-weighted, measured by the yardstick of a critical analysis of the work of elected representatives, by not giving these statements the importance it deserves.

Perhaps the decision would have been the same . The grounds have so far been different.
For now, this decision leaves me a nasty aftertaste ... like a cruel impression that it is primarily a question of image before a rational decision.

Believe me, I have no particular sympathy for the character but I feed mostly a hatred for what this decision is: the perfect symbol of sarkos: populism combined with a political appearance.