Brent Everett Crush Online

The meuporg or spleen journalism

A meu ... what? Kezako? A
meuporg dear reader!
What, you do not know what a meuporg?
So you're not familiar with the buzz of the moment !

For those who have escaped the phenomenon meuporg, I invite you to do a quick search on Google, you'll find easily what you are looking for.

I do not dwell here to tell you what a MMORPG , other blogs geeks already do very well.

At the risk of Alyosha fall upon me to arm shortened, what interests me here is that this video symbolizes. Indeed, this column represents to me the epitome of wanderings of mass journalism.

All the elements that contribute to the general public turns away from the mainstream press are gathered here:

1. unverified sources (this does not even thirty seconds to check what a MMORPG on Google!)
2. Information that feels like cliché bienpensant is relayed (young meuporg gorge on, understood the game is evil .. .)
3. Finally, a column empty of its newsworthy because the reasoning behind the statement No. 2 is certainly tainted by the same lack of rigor
   
4. A journalist who still hesitate not to face the opposite million viewers and to peddle a message condemning a portion of the population relying on "hearsay".
   

Add to that the fact William Leymergie Télématin and are notoriously known for being a sort of school television , a first step for future journalists and columnists in grass before launching into the deep end of the audiovisual, you have reason to be fully disarmed before the prospect of a mediocrity that is likely to persist.

But I respect him too much journalism and acknowledges its imperative function of guardian of democracy not to worry at such a drift.

Mario Salieri Films Online

What about the current policy? Neither

is the question that comes to mind as the French policy am saddened by its emptiness.

First, the media and commentators struggling to try to draw lessons from the results, very predictable after all, the last regional elections.

Some speak of new wave pink, others from the emergence of a sustainable eco-leftist declination, some even suggest the solemn sanction of the people against the policies of Nicolas Sarkozy.

Bullshit!

1. Voters do not move, it is the only valid instruction that can be drawn from these elections is mixed.
2. The reasons for the abstention was so important to take no collective will to punish or promote one party or another. In my opinion, the French turn away from politics that is more than ever, a source of disappointment and institutionalized nepotism. French Political representation is no longer legitimate, she is not faithful to the aspirations of French, at least the silent majority.

This is further proof that forbearance is in the interests of the victors who never fail to communicate about their triumphant success! And yes, it's always from the mouth to say that we won 56% of the votes! That's less when it relates to the number of voters ...

The Democratic Movement tumbles?

Some rub their hands of such a setback, others try to explain this abject failure.
According to my readings on the project's modem remains unreadable to most of the electorate. Democrat ideology is obvious to all by the French left-right divide of the twentieth century still persists in the minds and many can not conceive that we overcome a bit beyond reasoning.

The fact remains that we may question the quality of governance of the party of 133bis rue de l'Université. Approximate communication, transparent procedures and unfaithful to the promises ...

I will also begin to wonder if we can really promote a message nine recipes using stale ...

The resurgence of political correctness?

Eric Zemmour became the scapegoat of an avatar of racism: the bienpensance .
This kind of thinking that has befallen all that closely resemble or indirectly to discrimination, for fear that the ghost is awakened even if fascist French than be silent any form of thought a little bit sulfurous.
I could already tell that there and it cost me to defend the character his side Zemmour as deliberately provocative and reactionary trend almost clownish m'insupportent.
But you should already know, dear readers, I am a lover of freedom of expression and I am part of the legacy of Voltaire: "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death for your right to say it. "

In the present case, although I readily concede Zemmour that may have gotten carried away by the desire to argue *, I agree easily in the direction of those who are offended that the outcry when he took the claim is totally unjustified and smells the hypocrisy.

I do not like this tendency of some to want to feel good by denouncing everything and anything like the fayot the first row of the class into CE1.
Desperate to please the mistress? Those are desperate to please the victims of discrimination. Why? Because we keep still to make amends for wrongs that our ancestors have committed, we are prisoners of a persistent feeling of guilt.

These faults were found. Doubt on this point. But still I would join Eric Zemmour (ouch, my fingers on the keyboard ...) in his article published in Marianne2 , there is no question of abandoning the universalism and equal republican status by recognizing a specific any part of the population. Mean by that, each ethnic or religious communities to establish the national fabric, it enriches its history, its sufferings, its peculiarities, but at no time, we can not set them against each other on the basis of this history!

Thus, when one says

"French people of immigrant origin were more controlled than others because most dealers are black and Arab ... It is a fact" Needless to

utter cries of ospreys! This deafening silence of the institutions that refuse to compile national statistics on ethnic only installs a little more racism! Now remain in factual:

few years ago, a survey commissioned by the Department of Justice to assess the number of imams needed, estimated the percentage of 'Muslims in prisons "between 70 and 80%. In 2004, the Islamic scholar Farhad Khosrokhavar, in a book "Islam in prisons (Balland) confirmed this figure. In 2007, in an article in Point, who had access to summaries of the Central Directorate of Public Security (DCSP) and the Central Directorate of Judicial Police (DCPJ) was estimated between 60 and 70% of the suspects listed immigrant. There are nearly ten years, Lucienne Bui Trong Commissioner in charge of urban violence to the central GR noted that 85% of perpetrators are of North African origin. In an article Le Monde, 16 March 2010, reports of RG on violent gangs, established that 87% were of French nationality, 67% of North African origin and 17% of African origin. "Most" is, in relation to these figures, the right word.

This, the legal professionals know only too well. Thus, it is because of this experience that the police come spontaneously to control populations at risk. Racism does not land in the facts but the interpretation that one actually.

It is not racist to learn such statistics recognizing that this population is more prone to crime simply because it is more frontally exposed to poverty, exclusion and adverse socio-economic conditions.
However, it would unacceptable to attempt to have the only ethnic approach to the issue of delinquency and crime, implying that this would be the only factor that explains why this category of the population would be a breeding ground " savages ".
But the media love the reflections in the punch and leave sensationalism to feed this cope of lead, which hit the freedom of expression since the late 80s.

Maybe Zemmour here that would explain his thoughts of ... still have it taken you should give him the opportunity. But where the devil really lies? Intending assumed but unprovable a journalist or the will to fight blindly against any recognition of distinctions within the population?

Equality is not egalitarianism.
Fight against discrimination is not bienpensance.

* Inevitably, when one is swept away by the will of two men (Paul and Mickey), it does not measure up ...

Eurythmics Sweet Dreams Piano Tabs

ultra-liberal or capitalist?

Succint little exchange with a friend on Facebook (yes, really!):

The ultra-liberalism is a term invented by journalists but that does not exist in terms of economic theory .
Strictly speaking, one could speak of neo-classicism .
Currently, the global economic system is anything but capitalist insofar including:
1. The politics of large groups is driven by a vision of short-term approach that undermines the sustainability of production means
2. The allocation decisions are made profits for the benefit of a few large shareholders at the expense of capital investments and human capital essential for business success ... See More
3. The globalization of the economy allows large companies to distort competition, especially through fiscal and social dumping
So it should come back to the foundations of capitalism and regulation (theory of the invisible hand has its limits here) to allow equality of the actors and the company is again the vector of common enrichment it should be.

Also, I should have added that in principle "under capitalism, the mobile main economic activity is the pursuit of profit which finds its counterpart in the risk " . any risk relating to these large groups of companies that enjoy a dominant market position and benefits related to tax planning and social - in other words, the desire to evade taxes and charges on developed countries to benefit from the labor and social conditions and higher tax weather in other countries while enjoying the purchasing power of western consumers - is an SME can do to a marginal level.

In addition, our global society is not even more liberal in that the only invisible hand is more abused by monopolies or oligopolies and therefore imperfect competition law maintains that even encourages such that the audiovisual industry, automotive, energy, film, music, real estate, etc..

Creative destruction, even under the liberal theory of the invisible hand can not even do his work on these companies, innovation is thus impeded. The car is a striking example of this as promoting or funding fossil fuel industry heavily without requiring adjustment, the state has largely prevented the emergence of alternative energy vehicles whose patents are Yet sometimes for many years!

In summary, our economy is not capitalist because only shareholders and not the core capital "means of production" is disproportionately favored over even the viability of a business over the long term.
It is not liberal in that situation of oligopolies or monopolies are not the result not the invisible hand of the market in a situation of perfect competition, but biased rules, diverted by the law or set of maneuvers undertaken globally.
The two points also compensate fully, the law generally occurs to correct the deficiencies of companies that have been managed to encourage the shareholders that they would have us take for entrepreneurs.

Hideo Wakamatsu Instructions

Football and Culture of disrespect

The political news is hardly motivating. From one side, the campaign soundbites, and the other, the resurgence a balance WSPU was believed abolished, there is little reason for optimism for the future.

And these are not the results, but worse still, the game rolled out by France Football Team who will put a balm to the heart of the French.

But when I exchanged with other users on this disenchantment among the national and public the conversation digress on the conflictual relations between the people and the football itself.

Also residing in England, and from a culture heavily focused on the football, I could not affirm with certainty that the France has no real football culture . This has not failed to provoke the ire of some who were offended that we meddle "culture" and football .

However, these reactions have not failed to provoke in me an interest as symptomatic, in my view, sources of this disenchantment: condescension.

Like the Internet, some pretend not to know the different meanings that can give the term "culture" in French, so I would remember that if this word can indeed describe the art of growing potatoes and minds, it is also a synonym for "civilization", of "society", etc. . In short, a word denoting an essential characteristic of a group, society, civilization, nation . We are talking

indifferently winning culture, culture of lying , corporate culture, culture of cheating , culture of modesty, and thus sports culture.
Now if I mentioned the "football culture" in France failing, it is basically to emphasize that this sport does not meet a breadth and such a success that can be said that this is an essential element in defining the French nation.

For Whiners, we need to highlight the litany on the intellect, cultivate a passion for football, contrary to what some imply, is not exclusive intellectual activity although it is, I agree, the image that persists in the collective unconscious and French precisely because France and football is "I love you, moi non plus" .

When it comes to exalt the patriotic, waving the flag of blue-white-red is "I love you." In other cases, "I do not either." What makes football clubs, football or spirit is not at the height of the fervor that we can meet our closest European neighbors: England, Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal.

also recall in passing that culture, is the art of raising the body and mind . Mens sana in corpore sano .

However, it appears that trend will be included in French society for many years and we can also find in our school model: recovery of materials called "noble" in contempt of others such as sport (or should we say, physical education and sports). So that it entered into the collective unconscious since our childhood that students who thrive in these materials are not worth those who excel in math or French, contributing to a standardization execrable and exclusion of those who n fell outside the mold of the college unique.

Now recall that despite the growing sense that these intellectuals bienpensants hear him give, not only scholarship in the fields of art and / or scientific . We can pretend to ignore the importance of football in some societies such as in some countries in South America or southern Europe, it will not change that there is a real football culture alongside other equally vital aspects of their nation.

I would take the example of the Portugal that I know well: football is an essential element of society, next to religion, the country's history, its relationship with its former colonies, the "saudade "Fado, food, popular indiscipline, its literature, its rurality, its superstition, its colonial past, its folklore, dances, variety, its relation to agriculture , the sweetness of life, etc. ...

Again, I just think that behind this unwillingness to recognize football as an essential element of French society, lies the reason that football could never be truly popular in France: condescension collective lend a demeaning to the passion for football based on assumptions bonds arrogance and contempt.

Yet France is not only that the Enlightenment is also Koppa, Platini and Zidane. And do not dishonor them to admit that love others ...