Mario Salieri Films Online

What about the current policy? Neither

is the question that comes to mind as the French policy am saddened by its emptiness.

First, the media and commentators struggling to try to draw lessons from the results, very predictable after all, the last regional elections.

Some speak of new wave pink, others from the emergence of a sustainable eco-leftist declination, some even suggest the solemn sanction of the people against the policies of Nicolas Sarkozy.

Bullshit!

1. Voters do not move, it is the only valid instruction that can be drawn from these elections is mixed.
2. The reasons for the abstention was so important to take no collective will to punish or promote one party or another. In my opinion, the French turn away from politics that is more than ever, a source of disappointment and institutionalized nepotism. French Political representation is no longer legitimate, she is not faithful to the aspirations of French, at least the silent majority.

This is further proof that forbearance is in the interests of the victors who never fail to communicate about their triumphant success! And yes, it's always from the mouth to say that we won 56% of the votes! That's less when it relates to the number of voters ...

The Democratic Movement tumbles?

Some rub their hands of such a setback, others try to explain this abject failure.
According to my readings on the project's modem remains unreadable to most of the electorate. Democrat ideology is obvious to all by the French left-right divide of the twentieth century still persists in the minds and many can not conceive that we overcome a bit beyond reasoning.

The fact remains that we may question the quality of governance of the party of 133bis rue de l'Université. Approximate communication, transparent procedures and unfaithful to the promises ...

I will also begin to wonder if we can really promote a message nine recipes using stale ...

The resurgence of political correctness?

Eric Zemmour became the scapegoat of an avatar of racism: the bienpensance .
This kind of thinking that has befallen all that closely resemble or indirectly to discrimination, for fear that the ghost is awakened even if fascist French than be silent any form of thought a little bit sulfurous.
I could already tell that there and it cost me to defend the character his side Zemmour as deliberately provocative and reactionary trend almost clownish m'insupportent.
But you should already know, dear readers, I am a lover of freedom of expression and I am part of the legacy of Voltaire: "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death for your right to say it. "

In the present case, although I readily concede Zemmour that may have gotten carried away by the desire to argue *, I agree easily in the direction of those who are offended that the outcry when he took the claim is totally unjustified and smells the hypocrisy.

I do not like this tendency of some to want to feel good by denouncing everything and anything like the fayot the first row of the class into CE1.
Desperate to please the mistress? Those are desperate to please the victims of discrimination. Why? Because we keep still to make amends for wrongs that our ancestors have committed, we are prisoners of a persistent feeling of guilt.

These faults were found. Doubt on this point. But still I would join Eric Zemmour (ouch, my fingers on the keyboard ...) in his article published in Marianne2 , there is no question of abandoning the universalism and equal republican status by recognizing a specific any part of the population. Mean by that, each ethnic or religious communities to establish the national fabric, it enriches its history, its sufferings, its peculiarities, but at no time, we can not set them against each other on the basis of this history!

Thus, when one says

"French people of immigrant origin were more controlled than others because most dealers are black and Arab ... It is a fact" Needless to

utter cries of ospreys! This deafening silence of the institutions that refuse to compile national statistics on ethnic only installs a little more racism! Now remain in factual:

few years ago, a survey commissioned by the Department of Justice to assess the number of imams needed, estimated the percentage of 'Muslims in prisons "between 70 and 80%. In 2004, the Islamic scholar Farhad Khosrokhavar, in a book "Islam in prisons (Balland) confirmed this figure. In 2007, in an article in Point, who had access to summaries of the Central Directorate of Public Security (DCSP) and the Central Directorate of Judicial Police (DCPJ) was estimated between 60 and 70% of the suspects listed immigrant. There are nearly ten years, Lucienne Bui Trong Commissioner in charge of urban violence to the central GR noted that 85% of perpetrators are of North African origin. In an article Le Monde, 16 March 2010, reports of RG on violent gangs, established that 87% were of French nationality, 67% of North African origin and 17% of African origin. "Most" is, in relation to these figures, the right word.

This, the legal professionals know only too well. Thus, it is because of this experience that the police come spontaneously to control populations at risk. Racism does not land in the facts but the interpretation that one actually.

It is not racist to learn such statistics recognizing that this population is more prone to crime simply because it is more frontally exposed to poverty, exclusion and adverse socio-economic conditions.
However, it would unacceptable to attempt to have the only ethnic approach to the issue of delinquency and crime, implying that this would be the only factor that explains why this category of the population would be a breeding ground " savages ".
But the media love the reflections in the punch and leave sensationalism to feed this cope of lead, which hit the freedom of expression since the late 80s.

Maybe Zemmour here that would explain his thoughts of ... still have it taken you should give him the opportunity. But where the devil really lies? Intending assumed but unprovable a journalist or the will to fight blindly against any recognition of distinctions within the population?

Equality is not egalitarianism.
Fight against discrimination is not bienpensance.

* Inevitably, when one is swept away by the will of two men (Paul and Mickey), it does not measure up ...