Frustration Rules The Board Game

MoDem

Should we hide it any longer?

The Democratic Movement is in very poor condition. Credited of only 4% of voting intentions in recent polls , the lexical field of the division is fully employed within the Democrats.

known departures bloggers emeritus, of the essential figures, or anonymous disillusioned embodying the blaze once the fledgling party founded at the end of the presidential elections in a surge of hope as we had rarely known in France of these last thirty years. There was

Quitterie there was Christophe there was Laure .
same time, the movement calling for greater transparency and greater internal democracy have multiplied between Grid and Promoters particular.

There was also this excessive media coverage of François Bayrou in the last European elections stifling the program (though quality) of the modem and especially the many talented people who wanted to wear it. Excessive media coverage that our party has partially disqualified during the famous duel between Cohn-Bendit.

There are still those designations top of the list that you do not quite understand, c practices are within departmental federations who cringe , and the ghost of the old UDF that never ends haunt us.

Today, even the most faithful begin to lower arm. Corinne Lepage
expresses his annoyance more openly ...

For my part, I freely admit many external factors which we did not facilitél a task so far. However, I also recognize the errors of direction 133bis rue de l'Université.

confess wait for a sign, a gesture, a reaction of François Bayrou: a rousing speech, a policy of internal communication and transparency review from A to Z?

In the wake of this hope, however, I harbor great fear: that he (continue?) Pretend to ignore what is happening or that this silent, hoping that silence will calm the spirits shriveled, or even that time will do its office.

What is certain is that we will be very difficult to organize the gathering of Democrats that we so wish, when, even within our party, the decline is increasing.

worse in my eyes, there is no other party to date, no other candidate who embodies the ideal Democrat.

I would be orphaned if the modem did not find the colors ...

Francis, tell us we need it!

Pokemon Crystal N6300

PS: the quiet Frêche?

"We're not really there? Peaceful, the Frêche?"

is what must now say some barons PS finally freed for good hair to scrape Languedoc Georges Freche which one can say he did not hesitate to utter statements of the politically incorrect. While some

bienpensants do not hesitate to make shortcuts in Manichaean making the former Mayor of Montpellier a vile racist holed up in the socialist lines, most agree that despite the many inappropriate statements, Georges Freche has proven throughout of his career these tendencies were alien.

Eviction in 2007 by Georges Freche was not insufficient in that it does not kill in it the influence of the character in that the operation of the PS suits very well the local barons. And that's what the former socialist: a local baron.

Thus, the list officially supported by the Rue de Solferino is ironically headed by the current mayor of Montpellier, which should mandate that the defection of Georges Freche due to multiple directorships. In addition, most socialist federations of the Languedoc-Roussillon strongly supports the current President of the Region. Its influence is total. Some speak of over 15,000 activists Inserts fully committed to his cause.

15,000 activists who may well follow in its wake is not nothing, especially in a bad way PS.

Now it seems that many recognize the quality of the work of Georges Freche for the city of Montpellier and the region.

Why not to renew its confidence? Worse still, why a decision so late?

moved to a sentence, certainly calculated, probably clientelist filed against a political enemy of 30 years. The PS knows that he will certainly lose the region for the outgoing President is known ever-present. Georges Freche

deserves maybe it opposes, but q ome thing bothers me in this decision ...

A decision which grants the sensationalism of the media, aping atrociously sarkos populism, preferring to meet an image rather than the interests of voters.
In other words, the politics of sound bites, motivating the most important decisions.

I do not think it is smart. Although Frêche is an arrant provocative.

I would have preferred that the decision be cons-balanced, under-weighted, measured by the yardstick of a critical analysis of the work of elected representatives, by not giving these statements the importance it deserves.

Perhaps the decision would have been the same . The grounds have so far been different.
For now, this decision leaves me a nasty aftertaste ... like a cruel impression that it is primarily a question of image before a rational decision.

Believe me, I have no particular sympathy for the character but I feed mostly a hatred for what this decision is: the perfect symbol of sarkos: populism combined with a political appearance.