Remove Write Protect On Flash Drive

How to be a teacher? Chain

Doubly tagged by my friends and bloggers Mathieu Disparitus , I can not wait.

To those of my readers who are not yet familiar with the principle of "tag", it is virtually no way to make a spray by a young creative lack of recognition, but simply to challenge one or more fellow bloggers, inviting them to speak on a designated theme or to answer a series of questions, while inviting others to do so, creating a chain.

You will notice that I'm not at my first being in nature rather polite, I respond easily to invitations ... if indeed the subject inspires.

In this case, contrary to the view of the privilege, a question of education is dear to me.
Not only because I am a father, I was already interested in the issue well before that. As the son of immigrants, the School of the Republic has always symbolized to me eyes, the vector of equality, one that compensates for the deficit due to a place of birth, socio-cultural environment unfavorable.

For several years, rage I found that the School of the Republic is down . Successive governments of left and right are locked in an endless hypocrisy, prisoners of ideologies unproductive, wishing this or that for the National Education but obviously preferring to put their own offspring in training elite.

Today, nepotism in full swing. To get a coveted position, an interview or another, the CV is no longer an illusion. Better to have an address book fully stocked.

Therefore, in this context, I am asked to define:

A. A "good teacher" in 5 words

Inspired: it is true that it is harder to feel interested in a subject when the teacher himself looked bored farm.

Demanding: with himself as with respect to its students. This is a disservice than to negotiate a level of knowledge.

Pedagogue: know is well know, is even better.

Brave: not to be easily discouraged by adversity because of adversity, there a.

Attentive: a good teacher is a teacher who is genuinely interested in the fate of his students, beyond its single subject, beyond the single year.

B. What teachers should learn

A teacher has to develop throughout his career:

• in the material he teaches
• on teaching techniques
• in techniques of human relations (relations with parents, personal development, maintenance of discipline, psychological approach to student ...)
  

C. To make a prof ... what is learned, which can not be learned

experience necessarily contributes to the improvement and development of professional qualities like all professions ... a teacher is seldom fully operational from the first day of work.

D. Tag 3 people

Falcon L uciolebrune and Mirabelle, if you feel like it!

Colour Dot Coding For Squash Balls

ORTF is well

Maybe you've missed the post in which I congratulated Vincent Peillon for last-minute rabbit asked to Arlette Chabot. (Ticket which blew my hearing due to section of the Express. Fr me cited among other bloggers).

As I indicated, "on a channel far more professional and independent, even in another context, no doubt I would have such an insurgent behavior."
I do not wear Arlette Chabot in my heart, just click on the tag Arlette Chabot to understand why.

However, I do not believe that the method Vincent Peillon, now supported by a PS uninspired, now is the right one. Challenging conventions of journalism horizontal prevent the holding of a free debate and not biased, but ... I applaud the goal is to send two messages to France:

1. Debate on National Identity is unacceptable because it is not on the nature of cohesion as a nation but so that it is entitled to claim or not French, awakening some inspirations foul.
2. The televised press can hardly be qualified as a journalist in the image of a press ailing, the free and independent information has given way to propaganda and government communications .

Demand for body art and the resignation of a few is cons-productive because it personalizes the debate where the problem is him indeed structural. That's what Francois Bayrou strives to report for several years and he is perfectly reflected in Abuse of Power.

horizontal Journalism is only the consequence of a system in which the media are under the direct influence of a small group of political and financial power. The vast majority these media are owned by some corporate groups in close relationship with the state or because their own way an intimate place of the President of the Republic, either because they are the biggest suppliers of the state.
In a system as concentric as ours, although it would be misguided large group that would not be in the grain of the Presidency of the State when the same presidency depends on the award of public contracts extremely juicy.
It is not insignificant that Nicolas Sarkozy decided to speak on TF1 tonight before the representatives of the essence of journalism horizontal journalism that speaks to perfection on a chain populist oriented but detained by best friend Nicolas Sarkozy. Expect what the soup is served to him ...

The case of France Televisions may be more apparent.
Collusion between government and media on a public channel is a suspicion that already weighs heavy without it being necessary to add additional objective reasons ... or, how can we hope that the editorial line is completely independent when the President of France Televisions was appointed indirectly by the Head of State? No need for orders, instructions, the "invisible hand" will do its job and the fear of losing his job will do the rest.
(Editor's note: The CSA is designated by the majority in plac e itself under supervision of the President).

short, no need to demand a resignation or two, what is needed is to change the system ... but why does it still make 's amendments thereto be adopted .. .
Amendments which have not received real support from the PS ...

Remember, "There is no freedom without freedom". Without
freedom to inform, there is no democracy.

Can we still consider mediation as a democracy?

...

How To Kill A Warts On Gums

Europe-Ecology: The Great Illusion

How a movement formed in the European elections, has it become in the eyes of our dear and loving media a political force must presented now as the new left force sometimes as the renewal of the policy?

Several buddies bloggers have responded to the invitation of the movement to launch the campaign for regional elections this Saturday, January 16 Montreuil: an opportunity for all to discover the stories brilliantly performed by our talented political blogosphere.

However, I can not help but reflect on what has brought us today to consider a motion made by electoral opportunity, that was not intended to be nationally, which we don ' estimated that very little central ideology, as now the messiah of the political opposition?

Remember score quite isolated from the environmental movement in the European elections , and the fact that the majority of swing voters had spoken in their favor was quite unable to cite a line of their program.

The image, still image.

Today, lack of common ground is striking. Sometimes we agree on the obvious proximity of the environmental movement with Democratic ideology, others on the collusion between the anti-globalization and anti-liberal, left-wing tendency. For now, Europe-Ecologie simply do name dropping , is to say, based on his political character, rather than on program communication and ideas headlights. Between

Meirieu Philippe, the great defender of the school trash that we know, José Bové, the atlermondialiste, slayer of liberalism, Eva Joly, Democrats close to the ideas, Dominique Voynet, following the classical ecology left, Augustine Legrand, tend extreme left, the cast has the air of relying on traditional party disappointed, like the 16% gathered at the European elections.

Except that does not build not a party simply on the basis of a common disappointment because everyone does not draw the same conclusions. One could make the analogy with the Democratic Movement who had gathered behind the voters disillusioned with the PS and the UMP ... except that
1. Francois Bayrou and his presidential platform of 2007 preceded the creation of Democratic Movement
2. There was thus an ideological basis on which voters have also found the simple disappointment

Now, obviously, Europe-Ecologie replaced the Democratic Movement as a troublemaker the French political landscape, but the whole question is what this movement has done that.

The Democrats may be worried about the rise of this movement, as opportunistic if the modem was the hope of the emergence of a genuine political alternative that would bring together all democrats in France, Europe-Ecology has not yet showed their credentials in this regard.
can emerge a variation of the Greens in the ideological positioning, which is merely a repetition of the classic pattern with a political color green, the cacophony within the leadership on the left hand sliding into the PS this movement.
It is equally possible that Europe-Ecology is a carrier of hope Democrat, causing a defection forever on the left and a membership at the center, the modem would be absorbed and de facto in this great gathering.

For now, though some swear it is otherwise, Europe-Ecologie not meet on its behalf as disappointed with the typology is very diverse .

voters voted for hope informs that an alternative which we do not measure the scope and meaning. They saw a picture , an illusion.

But the reality hidden behind illusion? That is the question.

hope it is not the hangover, provided the Democratic gathering takes place.

Brent Everett Brent Corrigan Crush

left of the disadvantaged: and then the rest? Vincent Peillon

I bounced on the ticket of Mr. Nicolas , from Kremlin-Bicetre and react to what is an anthem of the traditional left French, sung by our friends choral union somewhat dumb these days: increasing social minima.

Hammered, thrust, reaffirmed every political season, the message was somewhat melted into the landscape ideas and claims. The left is in this respect to the image of our beloved unions: discredited.

One reason I believe is that this left-political union has long been committed to defending the poor, not whether it is a wrong in itself, but this tendency to make a hobby, a symbol, an appropriation has actually altered the message that it should be broadcast.

France is not constituted only of the least advantaged, least of all by those receiving minimum social benefits that it is a tragedy that we can not deny, their proportion is increasing year by year.

Oddly enough, the message of the left focused on the fringes of France's least favored: perhaps try to buy our good conscience or genuine concern for their fate? Let them the benefit of the doubt.

Meanwhile, much of the French, that of the middle class was impoverished. Slip
income from labor to capital, structural unemployment serving as a fitter in wage levels, housing boom, the changeover to the euro from a sudden extra blade ripping open a wallet already particularly affected, etc. .

Now who has heard this argument drummed here and there, in response to the French middle class complaining of the situation:

"There's nothing to complain"
"There are worse elsewhere"
"There are some who can not even fill for months."

... as if a fight was exclusive of the other. These responses demagogic still ringing like a repeat of the left "monopoly of the heart" , decreeing that the fighting should be conducted or not. But this middle class has been forgotten by the left.

The crisis of representation of unions and the left traditional in my opinion is linked to the defection to the center (as if ideology was influenced by the level of his bank account) and failed to address the sociological changes since the service sector of the economy.

Apart from this, an economic perspective, the increase in minimum social benefits is a cyclical response to a structural problem: in other words, an attempt to plug a gap where the bridge is collapsing.

Like the minimum wage which the left has continued to claim his body and cry to increase, the question is: why have abandoned the rest of the French? Why fight for the minimum wage and minimum social benefits he always meant to neglect other employees? And France for small employers, should it be ignored?

Increase the minimum social benefits? yes of course if it is accompanied by a necessary reflection on our overall economic system.
Increase the minimum wage? Not unless one has the effect of squashing a little more payroll as a whole by creating large disparities in favor of some and kill small businesses.
Get a fairer distribution of wealth produced by the company: Certainly. It

no skirmishes because it is unacceptable that there are more and more working poor, the homeless, or households in a state of indebtedness, we can not forget that by dint of neglecting the middle class , it ended up feeding tirelessly category of the most disadvantaged.

During that time, disparities increased for those who already own everything.
This is not continuing to feed a system afloat now poorer than they fight the system. There are of course the emergency, but it should not overshadow the long-term and the necessary reform of our economy.
The traditional left
French know it do? I doubt it unfortunately.

Ibm Thinkcentre 8215 Audio Driver

Chabot down!

Not being in France, I learn from the online press Vincent Peillon created the event last night on France 2 in not calling the program "A You be the judge, by the ineffable Arlette Chabot.

The blogosphere reacts some approve, reject other.

who personally, I am among those who believe that participating in a debate on national identity and allow it to yours is already about to create a stigma and uninteresting to the game of the UMP. Spontaneously, as a staunch defender of freedom of expression, j'opinerais happy for a debate was held. It is also necessary that the conditionsdu debate are not biased.

First, given the theme itself, the question of national identity is very simplistic and encloses the debate on the issue of identity is then that we should consider on allowing national cohesion above all.
This cohesion depends not just a question of identity, but including what makes the link between members of a community. Respect for our fellow man, the laws of the Republic, shared values, etc..

Then a representative of the PS against the current Immigration Minister and spokesman for the National Front, Marine Le Pen, is a method that we begin to know the part of Arlette Chabot of attempting to make policy-show by creating the conditions for a heated debate. It would have been different if the entire panel was this policy, alongside experts, psychologists, philosophers (not real eh ersatz television Finkielkraut or as BHL) in a roundtable format, without putting forward a bilateral opposition artificial. This is certainly not telegenic but what do you want, when addressing such debates, the television format standard is perhaps not the best.

Vincent Peillon also said:

"I believe if you do not attract a lot of attention on things, things do not. If I had announced earlier that my decision I took a long time, then we might have found a replacement, there is always one to come on television, and it would re-issue otherwise, also said Mr. Peillon on RMC. So I think it should proceed like this, and I have not thought alone, there are times when we must find ways to be heard and means to enter into resistance, I think is there. "

So it knowingly representing the Socialists has made false leap at the last minute. I see for myself the desire to shake up the conveniences schlérosées media while talking about yourself. Clearly, something is successful.

On a chain far more professional and independent, even in another context, no doubt I would have such an insurgent behavior.
Here, in fact method of thugs, I tend to talk to resist.

PS: Note that I'm working my titles, at least I tried myself.

Conragulate Someone In Spanish

I do not believe in divorce

A statement that does not fit into the era of the time, I agree with that.

Some will surely accuse me of blind loyalty to Christian dogma, but let's be clear, there is no question for me to adapt to the dogma, but it turns out that I fully corresponds .

Lorsqu'est addressed the issue of marriage in discussions with friends, I know that my intervention will inevitably cause large eyes staring at my speakers. What do you want, I do not believe in divorce.

My most arrant opponents as offended by my personal opinion on a rush usually somewhat trivial argument, convinced of having discovered a way to undermine the whole edifice of my Catholic precepts. Except that question argument, it would be rather extreme examples supposed to advocate for the cause of individualism.

Yes, I associate necessarily individualism and divorce since the second approach borrows necessarily the first. And every example that is typically used can not shake the very foundations of marriage. They invite us to apply the ideas with discernment and humanity, but not at the first hurdle he must renounce his ideas.

Some oppose absolutism of Catholicism in pragmatism divorce.
I remain convinced that for me the very existence of divorce is an invitation to the collective unconscious to desecrate the marital union, and thus the home and the family unit.
It's like creating a contractual right to early termination in a contract to term, except that the object here is far more sacred than a financial issue.

"And how do you get when you no longer love?" "How do we do when one is happier with the other?"

Very good question that raises questions about what Love.
Can we really do love each other after many more years together? Love it disappears?
I do not think so. The reasons that have led to the union and the establishment of a home does not disappear although they can be abused by external events.
But when the divorce is, many will tend to blame the spouse of the evils which he suffers to a precise moment and take marriage as designated culprit.

In France, one in three marriages ends in divorce, and one in two in the Paris region, you will notice that it still means that two out of three do not end in divorce! I For whatever reason, this statistic is wielded by advocates of divorce as a victory.

But there are few amazing things in this general trend in that few men and women are actually capable of introspection . Introspection is a job prerequisite to the existence of a genuine human humility, essential to life in harmony with others. The psychology here
joined religion in that the work on oneself is intrinsic to the Christian life. How
really love our neighbor if he is accused of spontaneous pain that we suffer every day?

This mechanism is yet so banal. A large majority of people will seek the solution to their psychological problems among the other rather than to question the underlying reasons why they suffer. Some people have also erected a rampart prohibiting anyone from interfering with the intricacies of their egos. hard to help those who will not really be helped.

What have I seen couples are separating for absurd reasons or bad reasons.
The woman leaving her husband because she can no longer be happy since the death of his father (true: will she be happy once divorced?). Two children under 7 years must pass this story.
The couple on the verge of separating because everyone does not know to get rid of the heavy personal baggage they brought with them. Instead of conducting the necessary work on oneself, marriage is taken for target.

short, human psychology is such that in adversity, we seek a guilty spontaneously simple, identifiable, we can fight.
Marriage can not be a victim because it is the very symbol of the infinite Love which is altered, a love that should transcend human as an individual. This seems
silly to some but I do not care: love, not lust, attraction, sex, love is everlasting I said, it exceeds the daily quota rights and the fact that Man is a mammal with a conscience.

In conclusion, I am one of those who believe that marriage is a serious commitment, a solemn and sacred, indivisible of family formation, and that we can not follow this path lightly, nor stop it because we does not end the love.

However, this necessarily implies the exclusion of arranged marriages, discourage hasty unions, invite reflection, be sure with his future spouse's sense of commitment that you want to take the meaning given to Love.

Respect marriage is follow Love.
This is certainly not easy. No, marriage is not simple. But a life without marriage is not over.
Love is that it transcends it.

Sweater Vest Ok For Weddings

I leave my retirement my best wishes for 2010

Nicolas asked about my new and the Firefly Brown and I thank them.

The end of the year 2009 was for me a combination of small health problems, really small but terribly inconvenient. However, in a family of four, you quickly share your germs without realizing it ... parents, children, paternal grandparents, maternal grandparents, all succumbed to the charms of colds, ear infections, seasonal flu.

However, when your child a year and a half, reached temperatures above 40 ° C, you tend to relativize remains strongly. See my daughter with feverish eyes, tears of discomfort in a state that does not improve for three weeks ... my heart on hold. And rage against a medicine that is modern but still powerless ... I

into perspective, it was only minor illnesses but the parent that I am part of that class that would protect his people against any form of affection, small or large.

I was glad to be with my family in France but the context does not allow us to full rest.

beginning of this year has been epic. Snow took the UK hostage.
I happily joined my house before falling the most important ... but my partner and my children had to stuff a journey of more than 9 hours for a journey that usually do that 5. With this fear of the accident, a car that deviates from its path, a sheet of ice ...

roads are still not clear. The government manages its stock of salt and sand.
If you live near a main road, a " A Road", then you will probably have little embarrassed. But if, as me, you live in a city slightly recluse is the absolute paralysis.

Besides that, I had a wonderful Christmas and great New Year's Eve.
Family and friends were there and it was the most important.

policy could be put on hold and that's what I did.
I hope 2010 will be a year where we will listen to each other and keep the public interest in mind.

quarrels of politicians annoy me now. Worse yet, I do not want to hear about it ... at least for the moment.

I wish you all my best wishes for the new year 2010.
Year which is not great political significance, the regional elections will not deliver, I think, individual education. So long as it gives you personally the development that the company did not offer us.

Very Happy New Year to you.