A statement that does not fit into the era of the time, I agree with that. Some will surely accuse me of blind loyalty to Christian dogma, but let's be clear, there is no question for me to adapt to the dogma, but it turns out that I fully corresponds .
Lorsqu'est addressed the issue of marriage in discussions with friends, I know that my intervention will inevitably cause large eyes staring at my speakers. What do you want, I do not believe in divorce.
My most arrant opponents as offended by my personal opinion on a rush usually somewhat trivial argument, convinced of having discovered a way to undermine the whole edifice of my Catholic precepts. Except that question argument, it would be rather extreme examples supposed to advocate for the cause of individualism.
Yes, I associate necessarily individualism and divorce since the second approach borrows necessarily the first. And every example that is typically used can not shake the very foundations of marriage. They invite us to apply the ideas with discernment and humanity, but not at the first hurdle he must renounce his ideas.
Some oppose absolutism of Catholicism in pragmatism divorce.
I remain convinced that for me the very existence of divorce is an invitation to the collective unconscious to desecrate the marital union, and thus the home and the family unit.
It's like creating a contractual right to early termination in a contract to term, except that the object here is far more sacred than a financial issue.
"And how do you get when you no longer love?" "How do we do when one is happier with the other?"
Very good question that raises questions about what Love.
Can we really do love each other after many more years together? Love it disappears?
I do not think so. The reasons that have led to the union and the establishment of a home does not disappear although they can be abused by external events.
But when the divorce is, many will tend to blame the spouse of the evils which he suffers to a precise moment and take marriage as designated culprit.
In France, one in three marriages ends in divorce, and one in two in the Paris region, you will notice that it still means that two out of three do not end in divorce! I For whatever reason, this statistic is wielded by advocates of divorce as a victory.
But there are few amazing things in this general trend in that few men and women are actually capable of introspection . Introspection is a job prerequisite to the existence of a genuine human humility, essential to life in harmony with others. The psychology here
joined religion in that the work on oneself is intrinsic to the Christian life. How
really love our neighbor if he is accused of spontaneous pain that we suffer every day?
This mechanism is yet so banal. A large majority of people will seek the solution to their psychological problems among the other rather than to question the underlying reasons why they suffer. Some people have also erected a rampart prohibiting anyone from interfering with the intricacies of their egos. hard to help those who will not really be helped.
What have I seen couples are separating for absurd reasons or bad reasons.
The woman leaving her husband because she can no longer be happy since the death of his father (true: will she be happy once divorced?). Two children under 7 years must pass this story.
The couple on the verge of separating because everyone does not know to get rid of the heavy personal baggage they brought with them. Instead of conducting the necessary work on oneself, marriage is taken for target.
short, human psychology is such that in adversity, we seek a guilty spontaneously simple, identifiable, we can fight.
Marriage can not be a victim because it is the very symbol of the infinite Love which is altered, a love that should transcend human as an individual. This seems
silly to some but I do not care: love, not lust, attraction, sex, love is everlasting I said, it exceeds the daily quota rights and the fact that Man is a mammal with a conscience.
In conclusion, I am one of those who believe that marriage is a serious commitment, a solemn and sacred, indivisible of family formation, and that we can not follow this path lightly, nor stop it because we does not end the love.
However, this necessarily implies the exclusion of arranged marriages, discourage hasty unions, invite reflection, be sure with his future spouse's sense of commitment that you want to take the meaning given to Love.
Respect marriage is follow Love.
This is certainly not easy. No, marriage is not simple. But a life without marriage is not over.
Love is that it transcends it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment