Maybe you've missed the post in which I congratulated Vincent Peillon for last-minute rabbit asked to Arlette Chabot. (Ticket which blew my hearing due to section of the Express. Fr me cited among other bloggers). As I indicated, "on a channel far more professional and independent, even in another context, no doubt I would have such an insurgent behavior."
I do not wear Arlette Chabot in my heart, just click on the tag Arlette Chabot to understand why.
However, I do not believe that the method Vincent Peillon, now supported by a PS uninspired, now is the right one. Challenging conventions of journalism horizontal prevent the holding of a free debate and not biased, but ... I applaud the goal is to send two messages to France:
- Debate on National Identity is unacceptable because it is not on the nature of cohesion as a nation but so that it is entitled to claim or not French, awakening some inspirations foul.
- The televised press can hardly be qualified as a journalist in the image of a press ailing, the free and independent information has given way to propaganda and government communications .
Demand for body art and the resignation of a few is cons-productive because it personalizes the debate where the problem is him indeed structural. That's what Francois Bayrou strives to report for several years and he is perfectly reflected in Abuse of Power.
horizontal Journalism is only the consequence of a system in which the media are under the direct influence of a small group of political and financial power. The vast majority these media are owned by some corporate groups in close relationship with the state or because their own way an intimate place of the President of the Republic, either because they are the biggest suppliers of the state.
In a system as concentric as ours, although it would be misguided large group that would not be in the grain of the Presidency of the State when the same presidency depends on the award of public contracts extremely juicy.
It is not insignificant that Nicolas Sarkozy decided to speak on TF1 tonight before the representatives of the essence of journalism horizontal journalism that speaks to perfection on a chain populist oriented but detained by best friend Nicolas Sarkozy. Expect what the soup is served to him ...
The case of France Televisions may be more apparent.
Collusion between government and media on a public channel is a suspicion that already weighs heavy without it being necessary to add additional objective reasons ... or, how can we hope that the editorial line is completely independent when the President of France Televisions was appointed indirectly by the Head of State? No need for orders, instructions, the "invisible hand" will do its job and the fear of losing his job will do the rest.
(Editor's note: The CSA is designated by the majority in plac e itself under supervision of the President).
short, no need to demand a resignation or two, what is needed is to change the system ... but why does it still make 's amendments thereto be adopted .. .
Amendments which have not received real support from the PS ...
Remember, "There is no freedom without freedom". Without
freedom to inform, there is no democracy.
Can we still consider mediation as a democracy?
...
horizontal Journalism is only the consequence of a system in which the media are under the direct influence of a small group of political and financial power. The vast majority these media are owned by some corporate groups in close relationship with the state or because their own way an intimate place of the President of the Republic, either because they are the biggest suppliers of the state.
In a system as concentric as ours, although it would be misguided large group that would not be in the grain of the Presidency of the State when the same presidency depends on the award of public contracts extremely juicy.
It is not insignificant that Nicolas Sarkozy decided to speak on TF1 tonight before the representatives of the essence of journalism horizontal journalism that speaks to perfection on a chain populist oriented but detained by best friend Nicolas Sarkozy. Expect what the soup is served to him ...
The case of France Televisions may be more apparent.
Collusion between government and media on a public channel is a suspicion that already weighs heavy without it being necessary to add additional objective reasons ... or, how can we hope that the editorial line is completely independent when the President of France Televisions was appointed indirectly by the Head of State? No need for orders, instructions, the "invisible hand" will do its job and the fear of losing his job will do the rest.
(Editor's note: The CSA is designated by the majority in plac e itself under supervision of the President).
short, no need to demand a resignation or two, what is needed is to change the system ... but why does it still make 's amendments thereto be adopted .. .
Amendments which have not received real support from the PS ...
Remember, "There is no freedom without freedom". Without
freedom to inform, there is no democracy.
Can we still consider mediation as a democracy?
0 comments:
Post a Comment