Not being in France, I learn from the online press Vincent Peillon created the event last night on France 2 in not calling the program "A You be the judge, by the ineffable Arlette Chabot. The blogosphere reacts some approve, reject other.
who personally, I am among those who believe that participating in a debate on national identity and allow it to yours is already about to create a stigma and uninteresting to the game of the UMP. Spontaneously, as a staunch defender of freedom of expression, j'opinerais happy for a debate was held. It is also necessary that the conditionsdu debate are not biased.
First, given the theme itself, the question of national identity is very simplistic and encloses the debate on the issue of identity is then that we should consider on allowing national cohesion above all.
This cohesion depends not just a question of identity, but including what makes the link between members of a community. Respect for our fellow man, the laws of the Republic, shared values, etc..
Then a representative of the PS against the current Immigration Minister and spokesman for the National Front, Marine Le Pen, is a method that we begin to know the part of Arlette Chabot of attempting to make policy-show by creating the conditions for a heated debate. It would have been different if the entire panel was this policy, alongside experts, psychologists, philosophers (not real eh ersatz television Finkielkraut or as BHL) in a roundtable format, without putting forward a bilateral opposition artificial. This is certainly not telegenic but what do you want, when addressing such debates, the television format standard is perhaps not the best.
Vincent Peillon also said:
"I believe if you do not attract a lot of attention on things, things do not. If I had announced earlier that my decision I took a long time, then we might have found a replacement, there is always one to come on television, and it would re-issue otherwise, also said Mr. Peillon on RMC. So I think it should proceed like this, and I have not thought alone, there are times when we must find ways to be heard and means to enter into resistance, I think is there. "So it knowingly representing the Socialists has made false leap at the last minute. I see for myself the desire to shake up the conveniences schlérosées media while talking about yourself. Clearly, something is successful.
On a chain far more professional and independent, even in another context, no doubt I would have such an insurgent behavior.
Here, in fact method of thugs, I tend to talk to resist.
PS: Note that I'm working my titles, at least I tried myself.
0 comments:
Post a Comment