Is it wise, to the point where we are, to stir as you made the tensions between universities and IUFM? Like you, I am a signatory of the appeal. I agree with most of your contribution. However, the critical rigor of the historian - as announced in the introduction to your text - no longer seems really operative when you write, without administering any evidence or argument to support serious about you, that "Lobby IUFM teachers" played a role in the implementation of the reform as it is presented to us today. I do not know what others think of IUFM signatories to the "Call Capes HG", but personally it makes me a bit spooky to be treated as such a pressure group whose existence, until 'to the contrary is proved, is more imagined than real. And you do not stop there! You add - always speaking teachers IUFM - that "the terms of the reform give them succeed" (really!) And a little further, that this "collusion" (nothing to it!) with political power is a way for them to "ensure the defense of niches [them] both positive." Around me, in the Poitou-Charentes IUFM particular, these teachers 'Machiavellian' is concerned, worried, some feel helpless and powerless against this looming on the horizon 2009, but none of them consider, to my knowledge this reform as an extravagant victory IUFM on universities!
Yes, we must continue to fight against this bad project to promote both academic research and training quality of future teachers. But if we want to achieve a positive result, even should he stop the bass attack us, who are ultimately the game department, and continue the fight together!
0 comments:
Post a Comment